Is Western Media Being Fair on #Sochi2014?

With all the recent talk of #‎SochiProblems on Twitter — which are completely legitimate complaints and should be reported on — I still can’t help but feel as though there’s something a bit too gleeful about the way western media has been covering the run up to the games.

Previews - Winter Olympics Day -2

I’ve laughed at the hilarious tweets from journalists discovering hotels without lobbies, toilets without dividing walls and doorknobs falling off in people’s hands as much as the next person has laughed — because yes, it’s funny (whether true or not). I’ve put together a Twitter list with nearly 30 prominent journalists who are tweeting out their Sochi experiences, which you can follow here if you’re interested.

So it’s not the act of reporting on these things that’s the problem. It’s the sheer delight with which western media is receiving the news. In an article for Foreign Policy today, Elias Groll has summed it up well (and I’ve chopped up his story a little bit to give you the main points):

Western journalists have traveled to Russia in search of the country of their dreams, and, lo and behold, they have found it. This is the Russia of the Western imagination: Corrupt, hollow, and dysfunctional. Sadly, the initial reports out of Sochi indicate that Olympic Games are going to be covered in utterly predictable fashion: as a confirmation of everything terrible the West thinks about Russia.

Is there some truth to the notion that Sochi was largely constructed as a vanity project — and, yes, a Potemkin village — to please Tsar Putin? Certainly. But the metaphor will be deployed with such laziness as to be meaningless. Here’s the takeaway from the Toronto Star’s piece comparing Sochi to a Potemkin village: “It feels like a place that is desperate to impress but just can’t quite get the details right, no matter that $51 billion was somehow spread around to make it happen.”

The notion that Sochi is “desperate to impress” is particularly hilarious. Isn’t that the sole purpose of hosting the Olympics?

It isn’t that these tropes about Russia don’t contain a shred of truth – the country certainly is corrupt, cold, and very fond of vodka – rather, it’s that Western coverage of Russia all too often presents the sad realities behind these stereotypes without any kind of nuance or imagination.

Putin often complains that Russia comes in for unfair treatment at the hands of the world media. Sochi will prove that he probably has a point  Elias Groll, Foreign Policy


While things do seem to be looking a tad messy in Sochi (although the picture above makes me want to book a flight right now), think back a little bit to the run up to the Summer Olympics in London in 2012.

We were told then too how disastrously the preparations had been going — stories of chronic construction delays, security concerns, worries that the city wouldn’t be able to handle the disruption — only we weren’t told gleefully, we were told with utmost concern. No one was feeling any peculiar delight in having to report those worries.

Back in 2012, even a vocal critic of the London Olympic project (Andrew Boff) said about London’s preparation:

“It’s the nature of any games — they look unfinished before you get there.”

The difference between Sochi and London may be that Sochi truly will not be ready before the opening ceremony — and if those Twitter reports are anything to go by, that’s an assumption we can make at least where accommodation is concerned. Although, while hotels with no lobbies and toilet stalls with no doors is definitely a stretch in terms of what acceptable accommodation should be, you’d have to wonder what kind of red carpet welcome western journalists were expecting.

They’re journalists, so they should be used to roughing it a bit. I’ve seen some tweeting out pictures of perfectly acceptable looking bedrooms and moaning about the “small” beds and whatnot — which does make me think a few might need a reality check.

Another thing to keep in mind is that the games have already begun and reports from a number of athletes are that they feel “safe” and “comfortable” so far — much to the disappointment of many observers, it seems.


There’s good and there’s bad. Clearly the ball has been dropped (pardon the pun) on a number of occasions in the run up to the games, security concerns are more worrying than usual — and then there’s the usual human rights concerns and complaints that go hand in hand with these events.

All I’m saying is, I want to hear the news, but I don’t want to feel like journalists are going out of their way to make the place look as horrific as possible.

The nature of the reporting and the whole affair in general has reminded me of something I read recently in a book I mentioned here before, A Russian Journal, by John Steinbeck. Published in 1948, and yet surprisingly still in its own way, so relevant to the fraught relationship between Russia and the western world today:

“We found that thousands of people were suffering from acute Moscowitis — a state which permits the belief of any absurdity and the shoving away of any facts. Eventually, of course, we found that the Russians are suffering from Washingtonitis, the same disease. We discovered that just as we are growing horns and tails on the Russians, so the Russians are growing horns and tails on us.”

[‘Like’ Journalitico on Facebook for updates]

18 thoughts on “Is Western Media Being Fair on #Sochi2014?

  1. Pingback: Blogging Sochi: An Olympics Roundup — Blog —

  2. Pingback: Blogging Sochi: An Olympics Roundup | The Digital Past

  3. Pingback: Blogging Sochi: An Olympics Roundup

  4. Pingback: Blogging Sochi: An Olympics Roundup

  5. Pingback: Blogging Sochi: An Olympics Roundup | AppsZoom - Download Free Android Apps!

  6. Had an Olympic games been held in the segregated southern US or in South Africa under apartheid, you’d be seeing the same level of schadenfreude in the response to what are clear problems with how they were put together. No one giddily reported on the awful conditions in London in 2012 A) because they weren’t awful and B) because the UK hadn’t just enshrined homophobia in its national law.

    • Reporting, in my opinion, should never be ‘giddy’. As I said many times I absolutely agree that the human rights issues and organizational problems surrounding these games should be discussed and reported on, but it’s still my opinion that you should feel like a journalist is reporting fact in a straightforward manner rather than self-servingly seeking out the bad at the expense of any good.

    • “… because the UK hadn’t just enshrined homophobia in its national law.”

      You are illustrating Danielle’s point perfectly. Western journalists have told you this lie about Russia, and you have just believed it without checking. In fact, Russia is a much safer place for gays than the USA, and infinitely better than genuinely homophobic countries like Saudi Arabia that get no criticism because they are on “America’s side” geopolitically.

      I don’t like the new law, but it is a total misrepresentation to call it homophobic. All it prohibits is propagandising children towards homosexuality when they have not already expressed an interest in it. (So it would not, for instance, cause problems for a counselling service for teenagers who were unsure about their sexuality.) Adult gays, on the other hand, have greater legal protection in Russia than in the USA. It is illegal to sack someone for being gay, and gay sex between consenting adults is legal throughout Russia – which cannot be said for the United States!

      The Russian law is quite similar to the old “Section 28” in the UK, which was only repealed in 2003. While a lot of us Brits were keen to get rid of Section 28, I think that having self-appointed foreign “human rights” groups attacking Britain using it as an excuse would have been very counterproductive.

      If you genuinely want to know the details, an American gay activist, Brian M Heiss, has produced an excellent study. ( , or search on “white_paper on LGBT rights” if that link is inoperative.)

      After analysing the misrepresentations in the Western media, Heiss suggests that they were motivated by the commercial interests of the U.S. entertainment industry. That was a reasonable guess a year ago, but now it is obvious that it was planned as part of the demonization of the intended victim of Western aggression. This is a process that our rulers have to go through to “Manufacture Consent” for the attack, as Chomsky puts it. (See It has been very effective in tricking an important section of Western opinion into unjustified hostility towards Russia.

  7. Pingback: Blogging Sochi: An Olympics Roundup |

  8. Pingback: Blogging Sochi: An Olympics Roundup | NZ

  9. Pingback: Revista MBA » Archivo del Blog » Blogging Sochi: An Olympics Roundup

  10. Pingback: The Wordpress VIP Club – Blogging Sochi: An Olympics Roundup

  11. Pingback: Challenging Bias & Recognizing When We’re Being Fooled | Journalitico

  12. Pingback: Blogging Sochi: An Olympics Roundup |


Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s